That’s where the Nikkor Z 24-120mm f/4 S lens comes in, offering a good compromise between a broad focal length, a fixed aperture, the promise of superior image quality and a reasonably travel-friendly size and weight. At £1199, it doesn’t cost too much more than the 24-70mm f/4, and about half what you’d pay for the 24-70mm f/2.8. To make a long story short, the only lenses that gave better results than the Nikkor 24-85, were the Nikkor 17-55 2.8 (which was sharper at the edges, and better corrected for distortion and chromatic aberration but costs three times more) and the tamron 90mm 2.8 (sharper overall and no distortion whatsoever but it's one of the best lenses out First, the 24-120mm f/4 S is a bigger lens than the 24-70mm f/4 S. For casual walk-around use, that does tend to make a bit of difference. I found myself having to watch from bumping the front of the lens into things while walking about, particularly if I had left it in the telephoto extended position. Nikkor 24-70 f/2.8 G on Nikon D3X. Soon after the big switch, the recession rocked our industry. For me, it was the first time working with a 24-70mm f/2.8 since those great years that I spent The original 24-70mm F2.8 GM lens isn't heavy, especially not compared to competing 24-70mm F2.8 zoom lenses, but the new lens is impressively lightweight. It weighs 695 grams (24.5 ounces), which En el AF-S 24-70mm f/2.8E ED VR esta caída de la luz disminuye bastante al bajar a f/4, en cualquier distancia focal. Las aberraciones cromáticas son visibles, en determinadas situaciones. Por tanto, puede ser necesaria su corrección desde la cámara o por medio de algún programa como Camera Raw, Photoshop o Lightroom. 7. At about half the price of the NIKKOR Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S, the 28-75mm f/2.8 still offers that sought-after f/2.8 maximum aperture that makes it a fantastic tool for people like wedding We tested the Sony FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II on the 61 MP Sony A7R IV where the lens and sensor achieved an excellent overall DXOMARK score of 39 points. This rating places it at the top of recent test results for this focal range ahead of the original Sony GM lens and even slightly in front of the previous best models; the Nikon Nikkor Z 24-70mm Nikon 35-70mm f / 2.8D AF Zoom-Nikkor photo. The aperture is fully working with 2.8 and this is not a joke. Sharpness at F / 2.8 on any focal, even the most extreme, is quite satisfactory (keep in mind that I work with it on DX cameras). At 70 mm and F / 2.8 it gives excellent portrait shots. Nikon 24-85mm AF-S G, 24-85mm VR and 28-300mm VR. enlarge. I'd forget this 24-85mm f/2.8-4 AF-D, sold today and introduced in 2000. It was never very sharp, even on film, even though it has a great 9-bladed diaphragm and works on manual-focus 35mm cameras. The original 24-85mm AF-S G (2002-2006) is a thoroughly modern lens, with astounding YQKolY.